In a significant legal development, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has dismissed the federal criminal case against President-elect Donald Trump, which accused him of attempting to overturn the 2020 election results. This decision follows a motion by Special Counsel Jack Smith, who cited the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president.
The Justice Department’s policy, established in the 1970s, asserts that prosecuting a sitting president would violate the U.S. Constitution by undermining the executive branch’s ability to function effectively. In their filing, prosecutors emphasized that the dismissal was not a reflection on the case’s merits but a necessity due to the defendant’s imminent assumption of the presidency.
This dismissal marks a notable legal victory for Trump, who is set to be inaugurated on January 20 after winning the November 5 election. The charges in question alleged that Trump conspired to obstruct the certification of votes following his 2020 defeat to Democrat Joe Biden, culminating in the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters.
In addition to the election subversion case, prosecutors have moved to end a separate investigation into Trump’s alleged illegal retention of classified documents after leaving office in 2021. While the Justice Department is seeking to dismiss the case against Trump, it intends to continue pursuing charges against two of his associates, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, who are accused of obstructing the investigation.
Trump’s legal challenges have been extensive, with four criminal cases brought against him: two federal cases led by Special Counsel Smith and two state cases in New York and Georgia. In May, Trump became the first former president to be convicted of a crime when a New York jury found him guilty of felony charges related to hush money payments made before the 2016 election. His sentencing in that case has been indefinitely postponed.
The Georgia case, which also pertains to Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, remains unresolved. Despite these legal hurdles, Trump’s recent election victory has shifted the landscape, prompting the Justice Department to reassess its approach in light of the policy against prosecuting a sitting president.
Trump has consistently denied any wrongdoing in all cases, asserting that the legal actions against him are politically motivated attempts to undermine his presidential campaign. He has vowed to dismiss Special Counsel Smith and his team upon resuming office.
The Justice Department’s decision to seek dismissal of these cases underscores the complexities of prosecuting a sitting president and the constitutional considerations involved. While the department maintains that the dismissal does not reflect the strength of the evidence, it acknowledges the necessity of adhering to established policies.
Legal experts note that while the current prosecutions are being halted, the possibility remains that Trump could face charges after leaving office. However, pursuing such cases in the future may present challenges due to the passage of time and potential legal obstacles.
The dismissal of these cases has elicited varied reactions. Trump’s spokesperson, Steven Cheung, hailed the outcome as a major victory for the rule of law, while critics argue that it sets a concerning precedent regarding presidential accountability.
As Trump prepares to assume the presidency once more, the Justice Department’s actions highlight the delicate balance between upholding the law and respecting the constitutional protections afforded to the executive branch. The resolution of these cases may influence future considerations of presidential immunity and the scope of prosecutorial authority.
The broader implications of this decision are likely to be the subject of ongoing debate among legal scholars, policymakers, and the public. The intersection of law, politics, and presidential power continues to be a complex and evolving area of American governance.
In the coming months, attention will turn to how the Justice Department navigates its role under the incoming administration and how it addresses ongoing investigations involving the president-elect. The department’s commitment to impartiality and adherence to legal precedents will be closely scrutinized.
Ultimately, the dismissal of these cases serves as a reminder of the unique legal considerations that arise when dealing with a sitting president and the enduring importance of the constitutional framework that guides the nation’s legal system.
COMMENTARY:
Commentary: The Truth Triumphs as President-Elect Trump Prevails
The dismissal of federal criminal cases against President-Elect Donald J. Trump is not just a legal victory—it is a vindication for the millions of patriotic Americans who have stood by him through years of relentless attacks. If Donald Trump were truly guilty of the accusations hurled at him, these cases would never have been dismissed. Instead, we are witnessing the collapse of a corrupt system of “lawfare” that was weaponized to derail his campaign and prevent him from reclaiming the White House. This outcome proves what we’ve known all along: the charges were baseless, politically motivated, and designed to undermine the will of the American people.
For years, the mainstream media and establishment elites painted Trump as a villain, going so far as to liken him to Hitler. MSNBC, CNN, The New York Times—they all sang the same song, accusing him of every crime imaginable while turning a blind eye to actual corruption and abuse of power within the Democratic Party. And yet, here we are. Even MSNBC, the network that once branded Trump a dictator, is now cozying up to him. What does that tell you? It tells us that all their fiery rhetoric was nothing more than political hijacking—a desperate ploy to manipulate the narrative and tarnish a man who has done more for this country than any president in recent history.
The Department of Justice’s dismissal of these cases exposes the shameless lengths to which Trump’s opponents were willing to go to stop him. The January 6 accusations, the document retention charges—these were not legitimate legal matters but politically engineered distractions. The swamp believed that by drowning Trump in litigation, they could keep him out of the Oval Office. Well, they were wrong. The American people saw through their lies and elected him anyway. This dismissal confirms what we’ve known: the charges never held water because they were based on fabricated narratives.
Look at the timing of these cases. Why were they brought up in the middle of a heated presidential campaign? Why were they pushed so aggressively when Trump began to dominate the polls? Because this wasn’t about justice. It was about politics. The Democrats and their media allies couldn’t beat Trump at the ballot box, so they tried to bury him under legal accusations. This wasn’t law enforcement—it was political warfare disguised as justice.
Now, with the cases dismissed, the media is pivoting. Even MSNBC, which spent years spewing venom at Trump, is suddenly softening its tone. Why? Because they see the writing on the wall. They know Trump is the president-elect, and they’re scrambling to align themselves with his administration. This proves that all their outrage and attacks were never about principle. It was all about power. The “Trump is Hitler” narrative was just a political tactic, and now that it has failed, they’re retreating like the cowards they are.
Let’s not forget the hypocrisy here. While Trump was being prosecuted for spurious charges, real criminals like Hunter Biden and the corrupt Biden family were given a free pass. Where were the investigations into the foreign money flowing into Biden family coffers? Where was the accountability for the laptop scandal? The double standard is glaring. If justice were truly blind, we wouldn’t have seen such a blatant imbalance in how these cases were handled.
This dismissal also sends a message to the millions of Trump supporters who have been vilified for their loyalty. We were called deplorables, extremists, and worse. But we stood firm because we believed in Donald Trump and his vision for America. And now, with these cases dismissed, our faith has been rewarded. The truth has come to light, and it’s clear that we were on the right side of history.
The media’s cozying up to Trump now is a desperate attempt to salvage their credibility. They know they’ve been exposed as partisan hacks, and they’re trying to rewrite the narrative. But we won’t let them forget their lies. They accused Trump of being a dictator, yet here he is, taking the high road and preparing to lead this country once again. If Trump were the authoritarian they claimed, would he have faced such intense opposition from every corner of the establishment? Of course not. Their accusations were always projection.
This is a moment of reckoning for the Democrats and their media allies. They overplayed their hand, and it backfired spectacularly. The dismissal of these cases is proof that their entire campaign against Trump was built on lies. They wanted to break him, but instead, they only made him stronger. And now, as he prepares to take the oath of office once again, they’re scrambling to save face.
To those who doubted Trump’s innocence, let this be a lesson. The swamp will stop at nothing to protect its interests, even if it means tearing this country apart. But Trump has proven time and again that he is a fighter. He doesn’t back down, and he doesn’t give in. That’s why we elected him in 2016, and that’s why we’ve elected him again in 2024.
The media and the Democrats owe the American people an apology. They owe Trump an apology. But we won’t hold our breath waiting for it. Instead, we’ll focus on what matters: rebuilding this country and holding accountable those who sought to undermine our democracy. Trump’s victory is not just his own—it’s a victory for every American who believes in justice, fairness, and the rule of law.
As for MSNBC and the other networks now cozying up to Trump, we see through their charade. They’re not shifting their tone out of genuine respect or understanding. They’re doing it because they’ve been exposed. Their credibility is in shambles, and they’re trying to repair the damage. But it’s too little, too late. The American people won’t forget how they lied, manipulated, and betrayed our trust.
Trump’s opponents underestimated him, just as they underestimated the resolve of his supporters. They thought they could silence us with their lies and smear campaigns. But we stood firm, and now we’ve won. The dismissal of these cases is a testament to the strength of our movement and the righteousness of our cause.
Let this serve as a warning to the swamp: We are watching, and we will not be silenced. Trump’s victory is just the beginning. The American people are awake, and we’re ready to fight for our country. The swamp may have tried to destroy Trump, but in doing so, they’ve only destroyed themselves.
ARTICLE:
Discover more from Free News and Commentary Today
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
