MASSACHUSETTS U.S. ATTORNEY VOWS TO CHARGE THOSE BLOCKING ICE OPERATIONS

U.S. Attorney for Massachusetts Leah B. Foley announced on May 14 that her office will investigate and potentially prosecute anyone who interferes with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. While she didn’t reference any particular event, Foley described such actions as “disturbing” and warned that obstructing ICE poses risks to both the public and law enforcement officers.

“This kind of behavior shouldn’t be celebrated — it should be condemned,” Foley said in a public statement. She emphasized that her office, in coordination with federal partners, is prepared to bring charges against anyone — including officials, law enforcement, organizations, or private citizens — who obstruct ICE in a criminal manner.

The announcement follows a tense incident in Worcester on May 8, when ICE agents detained 40-year-old Brazilian national Rosane Ferreira de Oliveira. As agents tried to arrest her on Eureka Street, a crowd of about 30 people gathered, demanding to see a warrant and attempting to prevent the agents from taking her away.

The LUCE Immigrant Justice Network said someone alerted their hotline, which prompted activists to respond. Videos from the scene were widely shared online, showing heated exchanges and physical altercations. Worcester police ended up arresting Ferreira de Oliveira’s teenage daughter and local school committee candidate Ashley Spring. Spring faces charges including assaulting a police officer and interfering with law enforcement. The daughter, who reportedly tried to block the ICE vehicle while holding a baby, is charged with multiple offenses including child endangerment and resisting arrest.

Worcester City Councilor Etel Haxhiaj was also present and, according to video, attempted to shield Ferreira de Oliveira from agents. The New England Police Benevolent Association Local 911 has since called for an ethics investigation into Haxhiaj, accusing her of provoking hostility toward police. However, local activists have praised her actions and held several protests since the event.

Ferreira de Oliveira is currently being held in a Rhode Island detention facility and is facing charges from a separate incident in February, in which she allegedly assaulted her pregnant teenage daughter with a phone charger cable.

COMMENTARY:

The United States is a nation founded on the rule of law. When individuals or groups decide to take the law into their own hands by obstructing lawful immigration enforcement, they threaten not just the authority of federal agencies but the very principles that hold our system together. ICE agents operate under federal mandates to identify and detain individuals who have violated immigration laws. Interfering with these operations — whether by blocking arrests, forming human shields, or rallying resistance — is not an act of civil disobedience, it is a crime.

In the recent case out of Worcester, Massachusetts, the situation escalated beyond protest. Individuals gathered around ICE agents attempting to make an arrest, demanded to see a warrant, and physically stood in the way. Some of these individuals even resorted to aggressive behavior, and local police were forced to step in and make arrests. Among those arrested were a political candidate and a minor who placed herself and a newborn baby in harm’s way. This is not brave or noble — it is reckless endangerment and obstruction of justice.

Supporters of the obstruction may argue that they were acting out of compassion or standing up for immigrants, but the facts of the case tell a different story. The woman ICE was detaining, Rosane Ferreira de Oliveira, is facing serious criminal charges unrelated to her immigration status. Shielding someone accused of physically abusing a pregnant minor is not about protecting immigrants — it’s about defying the law and ignoring the rights of victims.

Even more alarming is the involvement of elected officials in the confrontation. Worcester City Councilor Etel Haxhiaj was seen on video actively attempting to prevent ICE agents from doing their job. This kind of behavior from a public servant is unacceptable. Elected officials have a sworn duty to uphold the law — not to interfere with it based on personal or political beliefs. If a politician uses their office as a shield for illegal activity, they should be prosecuted like anyone else.

Accountability cannot be selective. If a regular citizen can be arrested for obstructing law enforcement, so too should a politician or public official. The badge of public office does not give anyone immunity from the law. In fact, those in power should be held to even higher standards, as their actions set examples for the communities they serve. Arresting officials who cross the line is not an attack on free speech — it is a necessary defense of legal order.

The law exists not to serve the whims of popular opinion, but to preserve peace, safety, and justice. ICE agents face enormous risk doing their jobs, often in emotionally charged environments. When groups swarm them or disrupt their operations, it places officers and bystanders in harm’s way. Allowing such behavior to go unpunished opens the door to chaos and further undermines the ability of federal agents to enforce the law safely.

Those who truly care about changing immigration policy should work within the democratic system: vote, petition lawmakers, advocate for reform. But taking direct action to prevent ICE from performing arrests — especially when the subject of that arrest is accused of violent crimes — is not activism, it’s obstruction. It’s a crime punishable by law, and it must be treated as such, regardless of the motivations behind it.

There is also a growing trend of politicizing law enforcement actions for social media clout. Videos are edited, facts are distorted, and entire narratives are built around false or misleading claims to incite outrage. This digital misinformation cycle not only increases public mistrust but also endangers law enforcement officers and the communities involved. We cannot afford to normalize illegal interference just because it trends online.

Federal laws must be enforced consistently and fairly. If we allow individuals — especially elected officials — to pick and choose which laws they will recognize and which they will resist, we undermine our entire justice system. Enforcement cannot be optional. If officials or activists block ICE from making arrests, they are violating federal law and must face consequences, including arrest and prosecution.

Ultimately, the law must apply equally to everyone. It doesn’t matter if someone is a politician, an activist, or a concerned citizen — no one is above the law. Obstructing federal agents during lawful enforcement actions is a serious offense. To ensure order, safety, and the integrity of the legal system, those who interfere must be held accountable. Arresting obstructive officials and citizens is not only appropriate — it is essential for justice.

ARTICLE:

https://share.newsbreak.com/d2zi1y5x?s=i16