TRUMP TO REVEAL MASSIVE ‘GOLDEN DOME’ MISSILE DEFENSE PLAN
Former President Donald Trump is set to announce a sweeping new missile defense initiative, dubbed the “Golden Dome,” during a White House event Tuesday afternoon, according to three U.S. officials. The proposed system aims to shield the U.S. from missile threats such as those posed by North Korea, and mirrors the concept behind President Ronald Reagan’s unsuccessful “Star Wars” program from the 1980s. Depending on its size and scope, experts estimate the project could cost anywhere from tens of billions to several hundred billion dollars.
Joining Trump at the announcement will be Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and General Michael Guetlein, the Pentagon’s deputy chief of space operations. Guetlein has reportedly been tapped to lead the “Golden Dome” project.
Trump’s interest in such a shield grew after he watched Israel defend itself against missile and drone attacks from Iran in 2024. Inspired by Israel’s Iron Dome system, Trump began calling for a U.S. version. At the time, military leaders stated they hadn’t requested such a defense system, pointing to existing programs already in place. Critics also questioned the necessity, arguing the U.S. is geographically protected by oceans and peaceful neighbors like Canada and Mexico.
Nevertheless, Trump’s rallying cry to build “the greatest dome of them all” was a hit with his supporters and helped push Republicans to officially include the missile shield in their 2024 party platform. In January, Trump signed an executive order instructing Hegseth to move forward with the effort.
“The threat of attack by ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles, and other advanced aerial attacks, remains the most catastrophic threat facing the United States,” Trump wrote in the January 27 order.
Since then, the Pentagon has been working behind the scenes to develop options for the system. “The Defense Department has gathered the brightest minds and best technical talent available to review a full range of options that considers current U.S. missile defense technology and cutting-edge innovation to rapidly develop and field a dependable umbrella of protection for our homeland,” said Sean Parnell, the Pentagon’s chief spokesman and senior adviser to Hegseth.
Key questions remain, such as whether the “Golden Dome” will be designed to protect the entire country or focus only on major urban areas. Congressional researchers note the system, regardless of size, could take years to build, even with advancements in technology like drones, satellite imaging, and AI-based sensors.
Budget concerns also loom large. Some worry the initiative could divert funding from other defense priorities. For instance, the Air Force is currently replacing its aging stockpile of 1970s-era intercontinental ballistic missiles.
A recent report by the Congressional Budget Office estimated that a space-based missile interception network could cost between $161 billion and $542 billion over the next two decades. While launch service costs have decreased in recent years, the increasing sophistication of missile threats from countries like North Korea, as well as Trump’s sweeping goals, mean costs remain high.
Israel’s Iron Dome is designed to intercept short- and medium-range projectiles and was crucial in defending against a massive Iranian attack last April. That multibillion-dollar system has served as a model for what Trump hopes to replicate.
Currently, the U.S. relies on systems like the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense program to intercept long-range missiles from adversaries like North Korea. But these systems may fall short in the event of a broader assault, particularly from nations like Russia or China, both of which are advancing hypersonic missile technology. The situation is further complicated by recent acknowledgments that Russia may be developing space-based nuclear weapons.
Trump has frequently referenced the U.S. contribution of around $3 billion to help Israel develop and maintain the Iron Dome system. At a June rally in Wisconsin, he told supporters:
“In my next term, we will build a great Iron Dome over our country, a dome like has never seen before, a state-of-the-art missile defense shield that will be entirely built in America.”
He added: “We’re going to build the greatest dome of them all.”
COMMENTARY:
President Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” missile defense initiative represents a monumental shift in the way America approaches national security. In an age where the threats to our homeland are no longer just theoretical but very real and evolving, this bold plan couldn’t come at a more urgent time. From hypersonic missiles to long-range drones and cruise missiles, enemies of the United States are rapidly upgrading their arsenals. The Golden Dome could be the critical shield we need to stop these new weapons of war from ever reaching our soil.
This isn’t just about replicating Israel’s Iron Dome system on a larger scale; it’s about modernizing our entire approach to defense. The U.S. cannot afford to rely on outdated Cold War-era technology to guard against 21st-century threats. Our adversaries are becoming more aggressive and more capable, and we must rise to meet that challenge with innovation, speed, and strength. A nationwide missile defense shield would represent a proactive—not reactive—strategy.
One of the strongest arguments for the Golden Dome is the added safety it provides for millions of Americans. Whether you live near a major city, a military base, or even rural critical infrastructure, the reality is that all of us could be at risk in a large-scale attack. Having a system in place that can detect, track, and intercept incoming threats could be the difference between a national disaster and a neutralized threat. This isn’t just good policy—it’s common sense.
Beyond kinetic attacks, the U.S. also faces a less visible but equally dangerous threat: electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attacks. These can be launched by hostile nations or, in some cases, occur naturally from solar flares. A single EMP event could cripple the nation’s electrical grid, disable communication systems, and throw society into chaos. This is why it is absolutely essential that the Golden Dome initiative includes provisions to shield our electric grid and critical infrastructure from such threats.
Shielding against EMPs isn’t a luxury—it’s a necessity. A high-altitude nuclear blast or a severe solar storm like the Carrington Event of 1859 could instantly disable power in vast areas of the country. Our hospitals, transportation systems, water supplies, and financial networks all depend on electricity and data. Without protection, these vital services are vulnerable. A resilient EMP defense strategy would serve as a powerful insurance policy against both man-made and natural disruptions.
Preparing for EMPs also shows foresight. While we often think of warfare in terms of missiles and bombs, future attacks may be silent, invisible, and devastating. An effective national defense program must anticipate not just what we can see now, but what we know is coming in the future. The sun isn’t our enemy, but its power can be just as disruptive if we’re not ready. Investing in EMP protection for our grid is a logical extension of any modern defense initiative.
Critics will undoubtedly point to the cost of such a system, but what’s the price of doing nothing? If a missile strikes a major city or an EMP knocks out our power grid for weeks, the economic, social, and human toll would be catastrophic. Billions spent on prevention is a small price to pay for avoiding trillions in damage, not to mention the lives that would be saved. National defense is not where we should be cutting corners.
The Golden Dome initiative also offers an opportunity to revitalize American industry and innovation. Building this system will require collaboration between government, private companies, and academia. It will create high-paying jobs, foster technological advancement, and place the U.S. back at the forefront of defense innovation. These are not just national security investments—they are economic ones, too.
Moreover, this initiative would serve as a clear message to adversaries: the U.S. will not be caught off guard. While diplomacy and deterrence remain important tools, strength and preparation are what ultimately keep us safe. A country that is visibly prepared for any type of attack is far less likely to become a target in the first place.
We’ve already invested billions in helping allies like Israel build and maintain their Iron Dome systems. That’s money well spent, but it’s time we apply the same urgency and commitment to protecting our own homeland. Trump’s plan to build a dome “like has never seen before” might sound ambitious, but ambition is exactly what we need to face today’s threats.
The benefits of this kind of defense system would also extend to state and local governments. Coordinating with federal agencies, cities and counties could have clearer protocols and better protection in the event of a missile or EMP threat. The Golden Dome wouldn’t just be a national shield—it would provide confidence and security to Americans everywhere.
Importantly, this initiative can and should be bipartisan. Regardless of political affiliation, every American wants to feel safe in their home, at work, and in their community. National defense shouldn’t be a political football—it should be a shared priority. The Golden Dome is one of those rare initiatives that can unite people behind a common goal: security and resilience.
In a rapidly changing world, threats don’t wait for political cycles or budget discussions. They evolve constantly. Whether it’s a missile from a rogue nation, a hypersonic weapon from a superpower, or a massive solar flare from the sun, we need to be ready. This initiative is one of the clearest paths toward ensuring our readiness.
Trump’s plan may be bold, but America was built on bold ideas. If the “Golden Dome” succeeds, it could be remembered as one of the most important investments in the country’s safety and future. The stakes are high, but the rewards—peace of mind, national resilience, and technological leadership—are even higher.
This isn’t about fear—it’s about preparedness. The Golden Dome, paired with EMP protection and critical infrastructure upgrades, could provide exactly what the United States needs: a durable, modern shield against the weapons of tomorrow. It’s time we take that step forward.
ARTICLE:
https://share.newsbreak.com/d659rx77?s=i16
Discover more from Free News and Commentary Today
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
