VIRUS SIMILAR TO EBOLA CAUSES BLEEDING FROM EYES, REACHES U.S.

A recent death in Iowa has brought attention to a rare and dangerous disease known as Lassa fever. The individual who passed away had recently returned to the United States after traveling to West Africa, where the disease is more commonly found. Lassa fever is a viral infection that is transmitted to humans through contact with the urine or feces of infected rodents. While it is endemic in several West African countries, it is rarely seen in the U.S.

Lassa fever typically presents with mild symptoms in about 80% of those who contract it, including fever, headache, and general fatigue. However, in more severe cases, the disease can lead to life-threatening complications, such as bleeding from the eyes, nose, or mouth, and in rare cases, death. The incubation period for Lassa fever ranges from one to three weeks, making it difficult to detect immediately after exposure.

The virus is not easily transmitted between humans, though it can spread through direct contact with the bodily fluids of an infected person. Health officials stress that the risk of transmission in the U.S. remains extremely low, especially given the strict protocols in place for handling cases of infectious diseases. Even in West Africa, the majority of Lassa fever cases occur in rural areas where sanitation and rodent control measures are lacking.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has confirmed that they are working with Iowa health officials to monitor the situation and ensure that all necessary precautions are being taken. They are also conducting further tests to confirm the diagnosis. Lassa fever is part of a family of viruses that includes the Ebola virus, but it is generally less contagious and less deadly than Ebola.

Despite the serious nature of this case, health experts emphasize that there is no need for widespread concern in the U.S. Lassa fever outbreaks are very rare outside of West Africa, and only a small number of travel-related cases have ever been documented in the United States. The CDC is focused on ensuring that healthcare workers are aware of the symptoms and how to handle potential cases.

Treatment options for Lassa fever are limited, though antiviral drugs like ribavirin have shown some effectiveness in reducing the severity of the disease if administered early. Most cases of Lassa fever resolve on their own, but for those who develop severe symptoms, supportive care in a hospital setting is often necessary.

In the wake of this incident, public health officials are reminding travelers to West Africa to take precautions, such as avoiding contact with rodents and ensuring food is stored properly to prevent contamination. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical in managing the disease, and travelers who experience symptoms after returning from the region are urged to seek medical attention immediately.

While Lassa fever poses a serious risk in parts of West Africa, the risk to the general U.S. population remains minimal. With proper monitoring and containment efforts, health authorities are confident that the chances of a larger outbreak occurring in the U.S. are extremely low.

COMMENTARY:

It’s absolutely outrageous that we are still allowing individuals with highly infectious diseases to freely enter the country without strict quarantine measures in place. This is not just careless—it’s reckless. When someone returns from a region known for dangerous viruses like Lassa fever, which causes horrific symptoms such as bleeding from the eyes, they should not be treated like any other traveler. Why are we gambling with public safety by failing to quarantine these individuals the moment they step foot back into the U.S.?

We’ve seen time and time again how quickly diseases can spread when the proper precautions aren’t taken. The global pandemic taught us that. So why are we acting as if deadly diseases from other regions won’t pose the same risk? Allowing a person to roam freely, despite coming from a country where Lassa fever is common, puts everyone at risk—from airport staff to medical personnel, and eventually, the general public. It’s mind-boggling that we haven’t learned from past mistakes.

What makes this even more infuriating is the false sense of security authorities seem to project. They tell us that the chances of Lassa fever spreading in the U.S. are low. Well, the chances of any disease spreading are low—until it happens! The fact that someone has died from this Ebola-like virus on U.S. soil should serve as a wake-up call. Instead of downplaying the risk, we should be taking immediate, decisive action to quarantine anyone who has been in an area affected by these kinds of diseases.

Public health officials need to stop underestimating the dangers of these viruses. It’s one thing to monitor people; it’s another thing entirely to quarantine them properly until we are sure they are not carrying something deadly. The “monitoring” approach has been proven ineffective before, and we simply cannot afford to be complacent in the face of a disease that can cause bleeding from the eyes and death. Why are we waiting for more lives to be lost before taking serious measures?

It’s not just about protecting the individuals who may have been exposed—it’s about protecting everyone else. We owe it to healthcare workers who put themselves at risk every day. They shouldn’t have to worry about being exposed to a deadly virus because our government is too lax to impose quarantines. They deserve to be protected by policies that prioritize safety, not convenience.

And what about the public? The average person going about their daily life shouldn’t have to live in fear that the person next to them could be carrying a rare, deadly virus. We shouldn’t be living in a society where diseases like Lassa fever could potentially slip through the cracks just because quarantine protocols weren’t enforced. It’s utterly irresponsible.

If we have the capability to prevent the spread of these diseases, why aren’t we using it? Quarantining travelers from high-risk regions should be the bare minimum requirement. We’re not talking about inconveniencing people—we’re talking about saving lives. The technology and resources are available to safely quarantine individuals until they are cleared of dangerous infections, and it’s infuriating that we’re not doing that.

In the end, this comes down to a complete failure of leadership. We need to demand better from the people in charge of public health. No more half-measures. No more assuming the risk is “low.” The risk is too high when lives are at stake. Quarantine those at risk, or we’ll continue to suffer the consequences of this dangerous negligence.

ARTICLE:

https://share.newsbreak.com/9kvfl53e?s=i16